White patient didn't want black
males in surgery
Doctor regrets having agreed to request
Tom Sharp - Associated
Press
Friday, December 8, 2000
Nashville --- Surgeon Michael R. Petracek
faced an ethical dilemma: grant a white patient's request to keep
black men out of the operating room during open-heart surgery, or
risk her refusing the potentially life-saving procedure.
Petracek wanted to make sure his patient got the care she needed,
so he agreed with the request. He asked a black male technician to
leave the operating room during the Oct. 9 surgery, a move he now
calls "a bad mistake."
Word slowly spread throughout the Catholic hospital about the
incident and complaints by employees finally made their way to the
hospital's executive committee, which took no disciplinary action.
Petracek (pronounced peh-TRAY-sick) is a highly regarded surgeon
best known for having developed a way to conserve blood during heart
operations so Jehovah's Witnesses, who oppose blood transfusions on
religious grounds, could still have surgery.
He briefly spoke to two Nashville newspapers this week about his
decision.
Petracek told the hospital, however, that the woman's husband did
not want black men looking at his wife's nude body, hospital
spokesman John Mays said Thursday. He noted that a black woman was
on the surgical team without any objection.
"The husband was very overbearing and told the doctor he was
pretty much their last hope," Mays said. "Basically, he was saying
if Dr. Petracek did not do it they were just not going to seek any
other care."
The woman and her husband, who have not been identified, first
went to Dr. John Austin at Baptist Hospital and made the same
request of him in August. He denied it and asked them to reconsider.
"She really did need an operation for something that was
ultimately life-threatening, so I didn't want to send her away after
one conversation," Austin said.
"I saw her about a week later and they were still just as
adamant, so I told them I could not alter our personnel according to
their racial bias."
Petracek took the opposing view. "I was trying to find a way to
get the woman the medical care she needed," he told The Tennessean
newspaper.
He told the couple he would do his best to honor their request.
As fate would have it, on the day of the operation a black male
perfusionist was assigned to operate the heart-lung machine.
Petracek quietly asked him to leave and replaced him with a white
technician.
"I'm solely responsible for what happened," Petracek said. "It
was not done maliciously. It was done in ignorance."
The perfusionist, who was not named by hospital officials,
declined to be interviewed. "As far as I'm concerned, it's done.
It's in the past. Dr. Petracek apologized to me," Mays quoted him as
saying.
The decision was reviewed by the physician performance and
medical executive committees of St. Thomas. No disciplinary action
was taken, although hospital executives made it clear they did not
agree with Petracek's decision and they encouraged him to apologize
publicly.
"An internal review concluded that threatening statements from
the patient's family put undue pressure on Dr. Petracek. This was an
internal matter, and all parties involved are satisfied that it has
been resolved," hospital officials said in a statement.
The hospital said the threat was the woman's refusal to have
surgery under any other circumstances.
Vanderbilt University medical ethicist Stuart Finder said
Petracek was put in a difficult position.
Finder said Petracek should have sought the advice of his
colleagues or the hospital's ethicist before asking the black
employee to leave.
"It's about finding the balance between the obligation to the
patient, regardless of their background or creed, and the obligation
to the community," said Finder, who helps direct a weekly ethics
discussion group for Vanderbilt medical students.
"I think the reports from other doctors are accurate, that Mike
Petracek is not a prejudicial guy. So something moved him. None of
us will ever know what it was, and that is the crux of the moral
issue."
Finder said that once Petracek agreed he would try not to have
any black people in the operating room, he was in a no-win
situation.
"If he asks the person to leave, he is continuing a racist view
that he himself does not agree with. If he doesn't, he is confronted
with the question of what his word means," Finder said.
"There may be those who say he did the wrong thing. I think
that's an oversimplification because moral life is much more
complicated than that."