Resources


FIRST AMENDMENT

FREE PRESS

FREE SPEECH

RELIGION

ASSEMBLY

TECHNOLOGY

INTERNATIONAL


NEWSEUM

FREE PRESS/FAIR PRESS

DIVERSITY

MEDIA STUDIES JOURNAL

PUBLICATIONS

FREE! RADIO

HOME     WHO WE ARE  |   SEARCH  |   PUBLICATIONS

School suspends African-American student for use of 'n-word'

By Aarika Mack
The Freedom Forum Online

10.18.00

To Nathan Martin, it was a friendly greeting, but according to a California school district, the “n-word” is unacceptable, even when it’s not meant as a racial slur.

The school recently suspended Martin, an African-American senior at Buchanan High School near Fresno for two days after he greeted another African-American student with, “Whazzup, nigga?”

Since both students are black, Martin considered his use of the word slang, not hate speech, according to a report in The Fresno Bee. However, Buchanan High School guidelines specify that racial slurs such as the “n-word” are unacceptable, under any circumstances.

“We have two ethnic students who are calling each other words that would not be acceptable if a white student was calling them that word,” Rene Errotabere told the newspaper.

“So to be consistent, we are saying that is a racial slur no matter who speaks it, and we are taking consistent action,” said Errotabere, an area superintendent with the Clovis Unified School District.

The incident began when an unidentified white student overheard Martin greeting 16-year-old Maurice Ward. The student who overheard the conversation was offended by Martin’s language and reported the exchange to school officials.

“This was not a racial incident,” Jim Fugman, deputy superintendent of the district, told The Freedom Forum Online. “This is an incident of a student using inappropriate language. It’s like using a curse word.”

Fugman added, “The school district and the school have been assertive in getting students to stop using that type of language in school.”

In 1986, the Supreme Court ruled in Bethel School District v. Fraser that school officials could punish a student who gave a speech laced with sexual innuendo to a school assembly.

“The First Amendment does not prevent the school officials from determining that to permit a vulgar and lewd speech such as respondent’s would undermine the school’s basic educational mission,” the high court majority wrote. “Surely it is a highly appropriate function of public school education to prohibit the use of vulgar and offensive terms in public discourse.”

The lower courts are divided on whether Fraser applies to student speech that is school-sponsored or to all vulgar and offensive student speech, even if it is wholly student-initiated.

Meanwhile, African-American leaders in the Fresno suburb are backing school officials’ attempts to keep the n-word out of the schools.

In an Oct.11 report in The Fresno Bee, Kehinde Solwazi, a professor of African-American studies at Fresno City College, agreed with the system’s assertion that students should be discouraged from using racial slurs, even in non-derogatory ways, although he questioned the severity of the punishment.

“I don’t think African-American children should use the word,” Solwazi told the newspaper, “When we use the word, we give license to everyone else. That word should be banned from our language.

“The word is negative and a symbol of oppression. The punishment is just a little too harsh. That is the only criticism.”

Johnny Nelum, president of the Fresno chapter of the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People, told the newspaper that he was “as guilty as anyone [of using the n-word], but it still doesn’t make it right. In fact it’s wrong. If we expect other nationalities to respect us, we have to respect ourselves.”

Rosemari Martin, Nathan’s mother, says she is concerned about the effect the suspension will have on her son’s permanent record.

“Nathan is totally upset,” she told the Bee, “I’m worried about it being on his record, and I’m worried about how he will act when he goes back to school. Will he have to watch everything he says and who he says it around?”

As for Martin, he remains puzzled by school officials’ reaction and his suspension.

“I don’t think I should get in trouble,” he told the newspaper. “If I’m talking and someone hears it and gets offended, it’s their problem. They shouldn’t have been listening to our conversation.”

Related
'Huck Finn' still pushes buttons, professor says
'If it isn't a dangerous book, there really is no reason for anybody to read it or teach it,' panelist Michael Kreyling tells First Amendment Center audience. 09.26.00
Michigan town won't buy dictionaries that define ethnic groups 03.08.99

TOP   | CONTACT US |   WHO WE ARE   |   SEARCH   |   PUBLICATIONS